“There is not any ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any in the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din observed firstly the deceased and after a ways they observed the petitioners going towards the same direction, did not necessarily mean that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. These evidence cannot be treated as evidence of very last witnessed.

fourteen. Inside the light from the position explained previously mentioned, it really is concluded that a civil servant provides a fundamental right to become promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be considered for no fault of his own and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency during the length of service or in the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 269 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

The criminal jail appeal is dismissed.appeal being time barred the appellant in his appeal hasn't challenged(Criminal Jail Appeal )

Deterrence: The dread of severe repercussions, which includes capital punishment, is meant to prevent possible criminals from committing murder. This deterrent effect is critical in reducing the event of intentional killings.

criminal revision application is dismissed. reduced for the period of his detention in jail he has already undergone(Criminal Revision )

82 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 on the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued for the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement from the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................

A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar trouble. When they sue their landlord, the court must utilize the previous court’s decision in applying the legislation. This example of case regulation refers to two cases listened to within the state court, within the same level.

This ruling has conditions, and Considering that the petitioners failed a qualifying exam, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based on the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances from the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 on the Constitution. Read more

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-223999 Tag:Provided the legal analysis on the subject issue, we have been from the view that the claim on the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Preliminary contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle will not be legally sound, Apart from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They can be issue to rules and regulations If your recruitment rules of the topic post permit the case from the petitioners for promotion may be deemed, however, we have been apparent within our point of view that contractual service cannot be viewed as for seniority and promotion given that the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health and fitness, matter to availability of vacancy matter into the approval in the competent authority.

When the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may perhaps dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a possibility to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is often only accomplished When the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Inside the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence plus the petitioner company responded into the allegations as a result they were well conscious of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use to generally be seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more

PACER allows any individual with an account to search and Find appellate, district, and bankruptcy court case and docket information. Register to get a PACER account.

In case the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may perhaps dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced an opportunity read more to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is frequently only finished if the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and the petitioner company responded towards the allegations therefore they were perfectly conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use for being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

It is additionally important to note that granting of seniority to a civil servant without the actual length of service almost violates the whole service framework to be a civil servant inducted in Quality 17 by claiming these benefit without any experience be directly posted in any higher quality, which is neither the intention on the legislation nor from the equity. Read more